Math 633, Advanced Calculus 1

                 Fall 2002, Ref: 16900
 
Todd Cochrane, CW 209, 532-0565,
  cochrane@math.ksu.edu

                http://www.math.ksu.edu/~cochrane/advcalc1/advancedcalculusf02.html        



Text: Advanced Calculus, An Introduction to Analysis- Third Edition, by Watson Fulks, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.

Goals of the course:  

1) To obtain a deeper understanding of Calculus 1 and 2. (Calculus 3 will be reviewed in Advanced Calculus II next semester.)


2)  To review and reinforce concepts and theorems  that you have already seen in Calc 1 and Calc 2, as well as to introduce a few new concepts that underlie these ideas.

3)  To develop skill at reading, constructing and writing proofs. You will be expected to write clean and rigorous arguments with correct logic and  grammar.  This will set the foundation for graduate level courses in mathematics and elsewhere, in particular, for Analysis and Topology.


Grading:

1) Weekly Homework Assignments worth 16 points each. Probably 12 assignments altogether, worth a total of 192 points.   Assignments will be due on Friday in class: Sep 6, Sep 13, Sep 20, Sep 27, Oct 11, Oct 16, Oct 25, Nov 1, Nov 15, Nov 22, Dec 6, Dec 13

2) Two Midterms worth 100 points each,  October 4 and November 8 (tentative dates.)

3) Final Exam worth 160 points.



Advanced Help Session:
Beginning September 4,  Cardwell  144, with John Rapalino and Mark Norfleet.  Monday 6:30-7:30 p.m.
Wednesday 5:30 - 7:30 p.m.


Old Exams:  These are from  Fall 1987, the last time I taught Advanced Calc.    Test 1        Test 2           Final

Solutions to this semesters exams:    Test 1         Test 2            Final

Solutions to homework:  HW2    HW5    HW6   HW7   HW10

Hints for HW 7:  #2b) Proof by contradiction. If the limit is not L then there is an epsilon> 0 and subsequence {a_{n_k}} all of whose terms are not in the epsilon NBD of  L (why?) Now apply Bolzano-Weierstrass to this subsequence.

#4a) Use Cauchy-Criterion,  4b) Let L be the limit from part a.  Let delta be such that abs(x-y)<delta implies abs(f(x)-f(y))<epsilon/2. Let N_1 be such that n>N_1 implies abs(a_n-b)<delta, and N_2 be such that n>N_2 implies abs(f(a_n)-L)<epsilon/2.  Suppose b-delta<x<b. Use triangle inequality to estimate abs(f(x)-L)=abs(f(x)-f(a_n)+f(a_n)-L), with n sufficiently large.